Two published zeros that are not the same kind of product

ERPNext vs Zoho Invoice: both are free, and the free is not the decision — the decision is a 500-invoice ceiling against a whole ERP

Both products publish a zero, which makes this comparison look like a tie and is the reason most write-ups of it go wrong. The zeros are not the same shape. Zoho Invoice is a hosted invoicing tool whose own page caps it at two users, three projects and 500 invoices a year, and it costs nothing because it is small. ERPNext is an open-source ERP licensed AGPL-3.0 whose own FAQ says you can “pay us absolutely nothing for running it and managing it on your own”, with hosting starting at INR 410 per month per site and published one-time implementation costs from INR 60,000. The real difference is not the price, it is who is responsible when it breaks, and that is where the hosted-versus-self-hosted split decides itself. One more thing we have to report: Frappe’s own two pricing pages disagree with each other about a hosting price, and we print both.

NoxOrigin makes neither of the two products compared here, and that is the honest version of the disclosure. We publish this page and we are a vendor, so we are naming our interest anyway: NoxOrigin appears here only as a short, clearly-bounded note at the end. ERPNext is Frappe Technologies’ open-source ERP and Zoho Invoice is Zoho Corp’s invoicing product, and we make neither. We are not going to claim our platform matches a full open-source ERP, because a hosted operating record is not a general ledger with stock and manufacturing, and we will not describe it as one. Last verified: 4 October 2026. The ERPNext figures come from frappe.io/erpnext/pricing, which is where erpnext.com/pricing redirects, plus frappe.io/cloud/pricing and frappe.io/starter-pack. The Zoho Invoice figure comes from zoho.com/in/invoice/pricing/. We have run no trial of either product, so nothing here is drawn from hands-on use, and we publish no customer count, market share or review score for either vendor.

Evidence and method

What we verified, and how

What we verified

ERPNext, from three Frappe documents. The ERPNext pricing page at frappe.io/erpnext/pricing, which is where erpnext.com/pricing resolves, returned HTTP 200 at 258,532 bytes and gave us the zero software price, the AGPL-3.0 self-host route, the site and server hosting figures, the 14-day trial and the statement that Frappe does not do implementation itself. The Frappe Cloud pricing page at frappe.io/cloud/pricing, HTTP 200 at 194,644 bytes, gave us the second server-plan figure and the feature-gated starting prices. The Starter Pack page at frappe.io/starter-pack, HTTP 200 at 270,532 bytes, gave us the four one-time implementation costs in rupees and the same four in dollars.

Zoho Invoice, from its own pricing page, HTTP 200 at 253,091 bytes, which gave us the single ₹0 figure, the three caps, the two-organisation account limit, the support statement and the data-retention rule.

What we could not verify

Any uptime commitment, SLA response time or support tier for Frappe Cloud. The pages link to a Service Level Agreement for the Priority SLA and print no number beside it, so this page publishes none, and we say plainly that if a published response time is deciding your purchase, ask for it in writing. We also read no Frappe partner rate, and no figure for any implementation work outside the Starter Pack list. On the Zoho side we read no Zoho Billing price, no Zoho Books price, and nothing about how either product feels to use, because we ran no trial of either. We make no compliance or certification claim about either product.

Side by side

A free ERP and a free invoicing tool, at each vendor’s own published unit

ERPNext and Zoho Invoice compared on published price, published scope limits, hosting and implementation cost, and support model, both verified 4 October 2026
DimensionERPNext / Frappe (verified 4 October 2026)Zoho Invoice (verified 4 October 2026)
Software price₹0, no billing cycle, no per-seat unit. Its own FAQ: “ERPNext is a free and open-source software and always will remain so … pay us absolutely nothing for running it and managing it on your own.” Structured data carries price 0, INR, licence Open Source.₹0, no billing cycle, no pricing unit. Its price line reads “₹0 for Seamless and Reliable Invoicing” and its structured data carries a price of 0, category free.
LicenceAGPL-3.0, stated on the page: “Deploy on your own server using our installation scripts … AGPL-3.0 licensed.” Its FAQ adds “we are 100% open-source. Our source code has been open source since 2009.”Proprietary hosted product. Its page states invoices carry “Powered by Zoho Invoice” branding, and makes no licence claim beyond that.
What the product isA full ERP, published on its own page as covering accounting, procurement, sales, CRM, stock, manufacturing, projects, assets, point of sale, quality, support, HR and payroll, and a no-code builder.Invoicing. Its page is a single-product page and points advanced users to Zoho Billing, which is a different product we did not price.
Published scope limitsNone published for software use. The only ceiling the vendor states is on the paid Starter Pack implementation, at “Small businesses with <50 users”.Three, all published: “Add up to two users”, “Create a maximum of three projects”, “Send up to 500 invoices per year”, plus “up to two organizations under the same Zoho Invoice account”.
Hosting costMonthly, per site, explicitly not per user. Site plans $5 onwards /mo and ₹410 onwards /mo. Server plans: the ERPNext page says $20 onwards /mo and ₹1,800 onwards /mo, with a dedicated block at $125 onwards /mo and ₹5,400 onwards /mo; the Frappe Cloud page says $40 onwards /mo and ₹3,600 onwards /mo. Frappe’s own two pages disagree and we print both.Not applicable. It is hosted by Zoho, and the hosting is inside the zero. There is no hosting invoice to budget for.
Feature-gated starting prices“Available on AWS and OCI in plans starting $25/mo or ₹2050/mo, and on Hetzner in plans starting $5/mo or ₹410/mo”, and for the server Product Warranty line “Available only for AWS and OCI in plans starting $50/mo or ₹4100/mo”. Both figures appear on both Frappe pages.None. We publish no Zoho add-on figure for Zoho Invoice, because the page publishes none.
Implementation costPublished, one-time, in rupees: Core ERPNext ₹80,000, Manufacturing ₹1,40,000, All in One ₹2,00,000, Frappe HR ₹60,000. A second table on the same page prints the same four packs as $1800, $2500, $3500 and $1800. Frappe states it does not do implementation itself and works through certified partners.Not published and not needed, because there is nothing to install. The page states “Set up your account within minutes and start invoicing your customers for free.”
Who is responsible when it breaksWhichever hosting route you chose, and that is the whole point of the comparison. Self-hosted, it is you. Its Product Warranty is “support from Frappe engineers for fixing bugs” and explicitly “does not include functional support”. No response time is published.Zoho, within a commitment it publishes: “Access 24/5 free email support from anywhere.” There is a separate cost to a free product, published by Zoho, which is the 180-day inactivity deletion.
Starting pointA 14-day free trial: “you will be given free access to ERPNext for 14-days. Once the trial ends, you will have to subscribe to a Frappe Cloud plan to continue using your site.”Immediate, at ₹0, with no trial to expire.

Where Zoho Invoice is the better buy

Zoho Invoice is the better buy for a business whose entire requirement is raising GST invoices, and we will say that without hedging. It costs nothing, it needs nobody to install it, it starts in minutes, and Zoho publishes both its price and its limits, which means you know on the page what you are agreeing to. For a consultant, a freelancer or a very small business that will stay under 500 invoices a year with one or two people, that is a complete answer to the question at a genuine zero, and an open source ERP would be solving a problem you do not have.

The published support commitment is a real part of this. “Access 24/5 free email support from anywhere” is written down, and for a business with no IT function, having someone else responsible when something breaks is worth more than any module in a larger suite.

Where ERPNext is the better buy

ERPNext is the better buy the moment invoicing is one module rather than the whole job, and the reason is structural rather than a feature count. Zoho Invoice publishes ceilings on users, projects and invoices a year, and those ceilings are the wrong shape for a business with staff, stock, several customers and a purchase side. ERPNext is also free to start in the strictest sense, and the vendor is unusually clear about why: hosting and enterprise support are how Frappe earns, and the software itself stays free.

The honest cost is the one Frappe publishes: hosting from ₹410 per month per site, and a one-time implementation list starting at ₹60,000 for the Frappe HR pack, with Core ERPNext at ₹80,000. A business that self-hosts pays no licence and no hosting bill and takes on the operational risk outright, which is a real trade and a legitimate choice for a team that already runs infrastructure.

The mistakes worth naming

Four ways this comparison is usually got wrong

Adding “free” and “free” together and calling it a tie

Two published zeros of entirely different sizes. Zoho Invoice’s zero comes with a 500-invoice annual ceiling and a two-user ceiling that Zoho states on the page. ERPNext’s zero comes with no published ceiling on software use and a list of modules that includes manufacturing, stock and payroll. A comparison that stops at the two zeros has described the price and skipped the product.

Reading ERPNext’s zero as the cost of running it

Frappe’s own page says “Your cost will include two components - Hosting and Implementation”, then publishes both: hosting from ₹410 per month per site, and one-time implementation from ₹60,000. Free software is the true and valuable part of ERPNext’s offer. Free operating is a different claim and it is not Frappe’s.

Assuming a published host price is the only one

Every Frappe Cloud figure is an entry price carrying the word “onwards”, and the named features are gated behind higher floors: ₹2050 per month for AWS and OCI site plans, and ₹4,100 per month for the server Product Warranty line. Quoting ₹410 as the cost of ERPNext in production is quoting the cheapest possible plan and ignoring which features come with it.

Taking one Frappe page’s server price as the answer

Frappe’s own two pricing pages disagree. The ERPNext page publishes servers at $20 onwards /mo and ₹1,800 onwards /mo. The Frappe Cloud page publishes the same family at $40 onwards /mo and ₹3,600 onwards /mo. We could find no note reconciling them, so if a hosting figure is deciding your purchase, ask Frappe which page is current and in writing.

By buyer

The decision, by buyer

One person, invoicing only

Zoho Invoice, on its own published limits. Two users, three projects, 500 invoices a year, 24/5 email support, a genuine zero, and nothing to install. Read the 180-day inactivity-deletion rule before you commit if your invoicing is seasonal, because that is the condition Zoho publishes and it is the only one on the page.

A growing business with staff, stock and several customers

ERPNext, and the cost to plan for is hosting plus implementation rather than a licence. Budget the site plan at ₹410 per month as a floor, ask Frappe which server figure is current, and get a written implementation quote. The published Starter Pack list starts at ₹60,000 and ₹80,000 for Core ERPNext, and it is scoped to standard implementations with no customisations.

A business that already runs its own servers

ERPNext self-hosted, and this is the case where the open-source licence genuinely pays. The vendor states you can install it locally and “pay us absolutely nothing”, and the licence is AGPL-3.0. The cost is not zero, it is whoever on your team owns the upgrade path, and the honest way to price that is to name the person and their hours rather than to assume it is free.

Where we fit, and where we do not

NoxOrigin, and why it is not the answer to this question

We make neither ERPNext nor Zoho Invoice. ERPNext is Frappe Technologies’ open-source ERP and Zoho Invoice is Zoho Corp’s invoicing product, and we are naming that first because there are two published zeros on this page and it would be easy to slide our own product in as a third price. It is not one. Against a free open-source ERP we are not going to claim parity with a general ledger, stock, manufacturing and payroll, because we do not have those and we are not going to imply we do. What we build is a hosted, supported operating record, and the honest comparison is that it is a different shape of thing rather than a cheaper version of either.

There are also maturity boundaries we state rather than smooth over. An invoice and a payment are different records, because conflating them is how money goes missing quietly. There is no change-request, milestone or deliverable record, no contract editor and no e-signature, so a scope change is a new quote rather than a tracked variation. There is no timesheet record and no payroll. Expenses live in Nox-Billings only and purchasing lives in Commerce, both scoped custom deployments. Merge policy is a setup decision, where detection flags candidates and a human reviews them. Shift close and day-end reconciliation are assisted-setup maturity rather than a self-serve switch. We make no compliance or certification claim of any kind, and we do not file GST returns or any other statutory return.

Our published pricing is the NoxOrigin platform plans in INR: Starter at INR 800 per month for three users in one workspace, Growth at INR 1,600 for ten, and Agency at INR 5,000 for twenty-five across three workspaces. That is the platform only. NoxCRM, Nox-Billings and Nox-Tickets are scoped custom deployments with no list price, and none of them carries the platform price. The two pages on this site that bear on that shape of question are NoxOrigin vs ERPNext for a small Indian business, which is the hosted-and-supported argument against self-hosting written by the party with the most interest in it, and ERPNext vs Odoo for an Indian business, which is a neutral read of the same open-source-versus-commercial split. Both are worth reading precisely because the first one is written by us.

FAQ

Questions buyers ask us first

What does ERPNext itself cost?

A published zero, and the vendor says so in its own words rather than leaving it to be inferred. The ERPNext pricing page's FAQ answers the question directly: 'If ERPNext is free and open-source, how do you make money?' with 'ERPNext is a free and open-source software and always will remain so. You can install this software locally and host it on your server and pay us absolutely nothing for running it and managing it on your own.' The page's own structured data carries a price of 0 in INR and a licence of 'Open Source', and the self-hosting option on the page is described as 'Deploy on your own server using our installation scripts. Great for companies with a tech team. AGPL-3.0 licensed.' A second FAQ answer adds 'No. Unlike other companies that mislead customers with open-source claims and eventually require payment for enterprise features, we are 100% open-source. Our source code has been open source since 2009.' There is no billing cycle on the software price, because there is no charge. What costs money is hosting, and the vendor says that too: the page opens by stating 'Your cost will include two components - Hosting and Implementation.'

What does hosting ERPNext cost?

Per month, per site, not per user, and Frappe says so explicitly. The ERPNext pricing page tells you to 'pay only for what you use, and not per user!'. Site plans are published as $5 onwards /mo and INR 410 onwards /mo for 'a single site with multiple apps on shared servers'. The word 'onwards' matters and we keep it: these are entry prices, not a fixed ladder, and they are the floor of a compute-based plan rather than a named tier. The second family is Servers, a virtual machine to host multiple sites and benches. Here the two Frappe pages disagree with each other and we print both rather than picking one. The ERPNext pricing page publishes Servers at $20 onwards /mo and INR 1,800 onwards /mo, and a second server block at $125 onwards /mo and INR 5,400 onwards /mo for a dedicated instance with 'Superior Dedicated Server isolation' and 'Stronger reliability guarantees'. The Frappe Cloud pricing page publishes Servers at $40 onwards /mo and INR 3,600 onwards /mo for the same family. Both pages also gate named features behind higher starting prices, in tooltips: 'Available on AWS and OCI in plans starting $25/mo or INR 2050/mo, and on Hetzner in plans starting $5/mo or INR 410/mo', and for the server Product Warranty line, 'Available only for AWS and OCI in plans starting $50/mo or INR 4100/mo'. Every figure there is monthly, and Frappe's own payment note says 'The Invoice amount will be deducted directly from your card at the end of the month'.

Does hosting ERPNext come with anyone to call when it breaks?

Not by default, and this is the single most important line on this page. Frappe's own FAQ says 'No, Frappe does not provide any implementation services directly. Instead, we work with a global network of certified partners who handle implementation, customisation, migration, and more.' On the support side, the distinction is between a product warranty and functional help: 'Product Warranty is support from Frappe engineers for fixing bugs in Frappe Apps (e.g. ERPNext, Frappe HR, Frappe Framework) and Frappe Cloud. You can raise tickets from the support portal and our engineers will respond in a stipulated response time. Note that this does not include functional support.' There is a Priority SLA above it, linked by Frappe to its own Service Level Agreement, and no response-time figure is published on the pricing page. If a published response time is deciding your purchase, ask for it in writing.

What does it cost to actually get ERPNext running?

That is the implementation cost, and Frappe publishes a price list for it. The ERPNext Starter Pack is a one-time fee, not a subscription, and it is published in rupees: Core ERPNext INR 80,000, Manufacturing INR 1,40,000, All in One INR 2,00,000, and Frappe HR INR 60,000. The same page publishes total hours and validity beside those costs: 40, 70, 100 and 30 hours, with validity of 30, 60, 90 and 30 days. A second table on the same page carries the same four packs in dollars, reading 'Implementation cost' $1800, $2500, $3500 and $1800, with rows labelled 'Implementation Hours' 60, 80, 120 and 60 and 'Timeline' 2, 2, 3 and 2 months. The page states the eligibility limit plainly: 'Only available for Small businesses with <50 users', for 'Standard implementations with no customisations'. One caveat we are not resolving for you, because the page does not: it labels its own four columns two different ways. The pack tabs read Core ERPNext, Manufacturing, All in One and Frappe HR, while the Modules row under those same four columns reads Finance + Sales + Purchase + Inventory, Core ERPNext + Manufacturing, Core ERPNext + Manufacturing + Frappe HR, and Frappe HR. We print both label sets rather than guess which is which.

What does Zoho Invoice cost, and what is the catch?

A published zero, with the catch written down on the same page. Zoho Invoice's pricing page is titled 'Zoho Invoice is free for all Indian businesses, forever' and carries one rupee figure, INR 0. We counted one price on that page: a search of the served document for rupee figures returns exactly one match, and the page's structured data carries a price of 0 with the category 'free'. There is no billing cycle and no pricing unit, because there is no charge. The caps are the catch, and Zoho states all three: 'Add up to two users', 'Create a maximum of three projects' and 'Send up to 500 invoices per year'. A separate answer on the same page states 'you can have up to two organizations under the same Zoho Invoice account'. Support is 'Access 24/5 free email support from anywhere'. And there is one condition worth reading twice: 'if a user is inactive for over 180 days, their associated data will be deleted in the following 20 days'. Note that Zoho Invoice is not Zoho Books, and the two carry different pricing models; Zoho Books is published per organisation per month on this site's other pages.

Which of these should an Indian small business buy?

Usually neither, because they are answering different questions, and we would rather say that than manufacture a winner. Zoho Invoice is a hosted invoicing tool capped at 500 invoices a year and two users. ERPNext is a full open-source ERP with an invoicing module inside it, no licence fee, and a hosting or implementation cost attached instead. If invoicing is genuinely the whole job, Zoho Invoice is the better buy on the evidence on this page, because it costs nothing, it needs no one to install it, and its limits are published. If invoicing is one module in a wider operation, ERPNext is the better buy, because Zoho Invoice's 500-invoice and two-user ceilings are the wrong shape for that business. Between those two sits a third option we will not pretend away: self-hosting ERPNext yourself, which is genuinely free in money and paid for in whoever on your team is on call when the upgrade fails.

Is NoxOrigin an alternative to either of these?

No. NoxOrigin makes neither ERPNext nor Zoho Invoice. ERPNext is Frappe Technologies' open-source ERP and Zoho Invoice is Zoho Corp's free invoicing product, and we are not going to present our platform as the answer to a published zero. We also do not claim to match a full open-source ERP: a hosted operating record is not a general ledger with stock, manufacturing and a chart of accounts, and we will not describe it as one. There are maturity boundaries we state rather than smooth over. An invoice and a payment are different records, because conflating them is how money goes missing quietly. There is no change-request, milestone or deliverable record, no contract editor and no e-signature, so a scope change is a new quote rather than a tracked variation. There is no timesheet record and no payroll. Expenses live in Nox-Billings only and purchasing lives in Commerce, both scoped custom deployments. Merge policy is a setup decision, where detection flags candidates and a human reviews them. Shift close and day-end reconciliation are assisted-setup maturity rather than a self-serve switch. We make no compliance or certification claim of any kind, and we do not file GST returns. Our published platform pricing is Starter at INR 800 per month for three users, Growth at INR 1,600 for ten and Agency at INR 5,000 for twenty-five across three workspaces, and that is the platform only; NoxCRM, Nox-Billings and Nox-Tickets are scoped custom deployments with no list price and none of them carries the platform price.

Sources checked

What we read, and what we could not

Read on 4 October 2026. This page publishes ERPNext’s zero software price with its AGPL-3.0 licence, Frappe Cloud’s entry prices per site and per server on a monthly cycle including the two feature-gated starting prices, four one-time Starter Pack implementation costs in rupees and the same four in dollars, and Zoho Invoice’s single ₹0 with its three caps and its retention rule. It publishes the disagreement between Frappe’s two hosting pages rather than resolving it. It publishes no uptime figure, no SLA response time, no Frappe partner rate, no Enterprise figure and no Zoho Billing figure, because none of those pages publish one. We publish no customer count, market share or review score for either vendor, and no testimonial from either. We convert no currency on this page, so the dollar Starter Pack figures and the rupee Starter Pack figures are both printed as the vendor prints them and neither is derived from the other.

Frappe

The ERPNext pricing page: the published zero, the AGPL-3.0 self-host route, and four hosting price blocks

We requested https://erpnext.com/pricing, which redirected to https://frappe.io/erpnext/pricing and returned HTTP 200 at 258,532 bytes with the title 'Pricing - ERPNext' and the page's own canonical tag pointing at the frappe.io address. Read on 4 October 2026. Everything ERPNext-specific on this page came out of this document. The software price is one figure at zero: the page's structured data carries '"offers": {"@type": "Offer", "price": "0", "priceCurrency": "INR", "category": "Free"}' alongside '"license": "Open Source"', there is no billing cycle because there is no charge, and there is no per-seat unit because the page says hosting is 'not per user'. We counted four headline price blocks and verified the count by reading the price blocks rather than the marketing prose: Sites at $5 onwards /mo and INR 410 onwards /mo; Servers at $20 onwards /mo and INR 1,800 onwards /mo; a second Servers block at $125 onwards /mo and INR 5,400 onwards /mo; and Enterprise, which the page publishes as 'Need Enterprise plans? Speak to our solution consultants', so we publish no Enterprise figure. Every price on the page is an entry price carrying the word 'onwards', which is the vendor's own wording and which we preserve rather than turning into a tier ladder. The unit is per month and per site for the site plans, and per month for the server plans. The page's two cost components are named on the page: 'Your cost will include two components - Hosting and Implementation.' The licence statement is the page's own: the self-host route reads 'Deploy on your own server using our installation scripts. Great for companies with a tech team. AGPL-3.0 licensed.' The trial is stated as 'In your free trial, you will be given free access to ERPNext for 14-days. Once the trial ends, you will have to subscribe to a Frappe Cloud plan to continue using your site.' We publish no uptime figure, no SLA response time and no support band, because the page publishes none: it links to a Service Level Agreement for the Priority SLA without printing a number. We also publish no figure for the ERPNext-versus-anything-else comparison pages this site links in its footer, because those are the vendor's marketing and not price data.

Open the source
Frappe

The Frappe Cloud pricing page, which publishes a different entry price for the same server-plan family

Requested at https://frappe.io/cloud/pricing, which returned HTTP 200 at 194,644 bytes with the title 'Pricing - Frappe Cloud'. Read on 4 October 2026. This page is here for one reason: it disagrees with the ERPNext page above about the same product family, and we are printing both rather than quietly choosing the friendlier one. On Servers, the ERPNext pricing page publishes $20 onwards /mo and INR 1,800 onwards /mo; this page publishes $40 onwards /mo and INR 3,600 onwards /mo. The two are the same product family, described here as 'Get a complete virtual machine to host multiple sites and benches' and there as 'Get a virtual machine to host multiple sites and benches'. We could not find a note on either page reconciling the two, so we do not reconcile them. Where the two pages agree, we say so: both publish Sites at $5 onwards /mo and INR 410 onwards /mo, and both carry the same two feature-gated starting prices in tooltips, 'Available on AWS and OCI in plans starting $25/mo or INR 2050/mo, and on Hetzner in plans starting $5/mo or INR 410/mo' and, for the server Product Warranty line, 'Available only for AWS and OCI in plans starting $50/mo or INR 4100/mo'. Those two tooltip figures are the highest-value lines on this page for a buyer who cares about which features come with which plan, and they are the reason the entry prices alone are not the whole cost. On billing, this page states two payment modes, card and prepaid credit, and says 'The Invoice amount will be deducted directly from your card at the end of the month', and elsewhere 'a monthly subscription for you will be created', so the cycle is monthly on every figure we publish from it. The page also states that Product Warranty 'does not include functional support', which is the same wording as the ERPNext page. The page's own framing of the hosted-versus-self-hosted question is the vendor's, and we quote it rather than adopting it: 'Not always. While raw infrastructure might appear cheaper when self-hosted, Frappe Cloud often reduces hidden costs such as DevOps effort, downtime risk, failed upgrades, and long-term maintenance.' We ran no trial, so we publish no view on whether that is true for you.

Open the source
Frappe

The ERPNext Starter Pack price list: four one-time implementation costs in rupees and the same four in dollars

Requested at https://frappe.io/starter-pack, which returned HTTP 200 at 270,532 bytes with the title 'ERPNext Starter Pack' and the subheading 'Your fastest way to get started with ERPNext'. Read on 4 October 2026. This is the only published implementation price list we found from Frappe, and it matters because the software is free while getting it running is not. The rupee table publishes four packs, and we counted the packs by reading the four columns rather than the tab strip: the pack labels read Core ERPNext, Manufacturing, All in One and Frappe HR, with Total Hours 40, 70, 100 and 30, Validity 30, 60, 90 and 30 days, and Cost INR 80,000, INR 1,40,000, INR 2,00,000 and INR 60,000. These are one-time implementation fees, not a subscription, and the page frames them as a fixed scope: 'Standardized pricing - Know exactly what you're paying for, no surprises'. The same page carries a second table for the same four packs in dollars, with rows labelled 'Implementation Hours' 60, 80, 120 and 60, 'Timeline' 2, 2, 3 and 2 months, and 'Implementation cost' $1800, $2500, $3500 and $1800. We publish the two tables as the page publishes them and do not convert between them. Two honest limits on this source. First, the page labels its own four columns two different ways: the pack labels read Core ERPNext, Manufacturing, All in One and Frappe HR, while the Modules row under those same columns reads Finance + Sales + Purchase + Inventory, Core ERPNext + Manufacturing, Core ERPNext + Manufacturing + Frappe HR, and Frappe HR. We print both sets rather than resolve the ambiguity, so a reader matching a pack to its scope should read the page. Second, the page states an eligibility ceiling, 'Only available for Small businesses with <50 users', for 'Standard implementations with no customisations'. We publish no Frappe partner rate and no partner name as a price, and we publish no figure for implementation work outside this list.

Open the source
Zoho

Zoho Invoice's own pricing page: one published zero, three caps, two organisations, and a data-retention rule

Requested at https://www.zoho.com/in/invoice/pricing/, which returned HTTP 200 at 253,091 bytes with the title 'Zoho Invoice is free for all Indian businesses, forever'. Read on 4 October 2026. The tier count is one and we verified it three ways: a search of the served document for rupee figures returns exactly one match, '₹0', sitting in the page's own price line '₹0 for Seamless and Reliable Invoicing'; the page's structured data carries '"offers":{"@type":"Offer","price":0,"category":"free"}'; and the page offers sign-up rather than a plan selector. There is no paid tier, so there is no billing cycle to state and no pricing unit to state. We checked specifically for a per-user or per-organisation label and found none, which is worth being explicit about: Zoho Books is published per organisation per month, and those are two different products with two different pricing models. The caps are quoted from the page's own FAQ: 'Add up to two users', 'Create a maximum of three projects' and 'Send up to 500 invoices per year'. A second answer states 'Yes, you can have up to two organizations under the same Zoho Invoice account', which is an account cap and not a pricing unit. Support is stated as 'Access 24/5 free email support from anywhere'. The retention condition appears twice on the page and reads that if a user is inactive for over 180 days their associated data will be deleted in the following 20 days, with users informed before deletion. The page also states 'Powered by Zoho Invoice branding' on invoices and carries 'Looking for an advanced solution for your growing business needs? Explore Zoho Billing'. Zoho Billing is a separate product and we read no price for it, so this page publishes no Zoho Billing figure. We also requested the global address https://www.zoho.com/invoice/pricing/, which returned HTTP 200 at the identical 253,091 bytes and resolved to the same document with the same single figure and the same 500-invoices-a-year limit.

Open the source
NoxOrigin

Our own published platform pricing, for the disclosure at the end of this page

Platform only, and explicitly not comparable to either product on this page. Starter INR 800 per month for three users in one workspace, Growth INR 1,600 for ten users, Agency INR 5,000 for twenty-five users across three workspaces. We publish this so a reader is not left guessing what our number is, not to place it against a free open-source ERP or a free invoicing product. NoxOrigin is a hosted, supported operating record and not a general ledger with stock, manufacturing and a chart of accounts. NoxCRM, Nox-Billings and Nox-Tickets are scoped custom deployments with no list price, and none of them carries the platform price.

Open the source